How to write a book review that leaves no doubt

Reviewing Jordan Peterson’s latest screed, James Marriott sought to write a review for The Times of London in which no sentence could be taken out of context and used as a blurb to suggest that he thought the book might be any good:

The last time I reviewed a book by Jordan Peterson, a cleverly edited excerpt of my negative opinion (I described it as “bonkers”) appeared on the cover of the paperback edition, giving readers the misleading impression that I had endorsed it. So this time I shall have to be clear. The new book is unreadable. Repetitive, rambling, hectoring and mad, We Who Wrestle with God repels the reader’s attention at the level of the page, the paragraph and the sentence. Sometimes even at the level of the word.

And even when I reached the end I couldn’t relax. I recalled that in an earlier chapter Peterson had intimated darkly that this book is only the first in a series. The stories of Job and Christ, he hints, “will be dealt with exhaustively in a forthcoming work”. Oh God. Please not exhaustively. I can’t take it.

[Read More]

Francis Fukuyama to Elon Musk

Worth a read: Francis Fukuyama’s latest post at Persuasion, “A Letter to Elon Musk”:

In any event, firing government bureaucrats is not necessarily a path to greater efficiency. It is a widely believed myth that the federal bureaucracy is bloated and overstaffed. This is not the case: there are basically the same number of full-time federal employees today as there were back in 1969, about 2.3 million. This is despite the fact that the government now disburses more than five times as many dollars as it did back then. In fact, you can argue that the government is understaffed, due to relentless pressure over the decades to keep headcounts down.

Instead, Fukuyama recommends deregulatory measures, targeting the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which stands in the way of many energy efficiency and infrastructure projects, and the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), which impose mind-boggling burdens on government purchasing, along with providing better recruitment, training, professional development and pay for federal employees—de-bureaucratizing the bureaucracy.

[Read More]

Coalition Shift

Via Damon Linker:

This may be the most fascinating chart I’ve seen yet with regard to the election. The author of the tweet is a data journalist.

- Damon Linker

Read on Substack

I suspect there’s a lot more going on than just those two factors, but there’s no denying that they are important. (I wonder, though—what’s the source data set?)

[Read More]

Global Trepidation

Damir Marusic, in “Complacency and the Coming Storm” at Wisdom of Crowds:

“Autocracy versus democracy” does not usefully describe the moment. It feels like a discarded line from some kind of late-night brainstorming session. … No, it’s not about democracy versus autocracy. The wheels are coming off. Our predecessors bequeathed to us a period of unprecedented tranquility. They were not infinitely wise in getting us here — no wiser than we are. But we grew up used to it in ways they could never imagine. We assumed order was normality, that peace was what naturally arose when power-hungry hyperpowers minded their own business. A better and more just world was there for the taking, if only we were moral enough to push for it.

An exaggeration, perhaps; and yet, I find myself wanting to respond to the unfolding global disorder by just doubling down on my effort to focus on my regular daily life—work on client projects, get the kids to school and back and to appointments, clean the gutters, winterize the sprinklers, wash the dishes, sweep the floor. There is a lot to be said for the mental and spiritual health aspects of focusing on the now and just doing what one can. But at the same time, I have the nagging sense that there is more global disorder and disruption to come, that the U.S. government has been so hollowed out by partisan efforts to incapacitate it that it would not be able to respond, and that the U.S. economy would not be able to handle a major conflict in Asia—to say nothing of the military, which would be undersupplied due to the lack of a sufficient domestic production base.

See also:

[Read More]

Stealthy Indeed

It seems that the F-35 is so stealthy that if the aircraft is separated from its pilot while in flight, the aircraft can no longer be found.

[Read More]